Stephen Roger Barnett (December 25, 1935 – October 13, 2009) was an American law professor and legal scholar who campaigned against the Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970 and the effects its antitrust exemptions had on newspaper consolidation. He also criticized the California Supreme Court for practices that hid information from the public.
A leading criticGraham, Michael. "A Death in the Afternoon", Cincinnati Magazine, March 1992. Accessed October 22, 2009. of the Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970, which was intended to allow multiple newspapers in the same city to survive by forming joint operating agreements to share revenues and cut costs, argued that the unintended consequence of the legislation was the consolidation and development of large nationwide newspaper chains. These agreements often resulted in the demise of the weaker paper once the agreement was ended.
In his article The Dog That Did Not Bark,Stephen R. Barnett, "The Dog that did not Bark: No-Citation Rules, Judicial Conference Rulemaking, and Federal Public Defenders", Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 4 (2005). Barnett was critical of a practice called "depublication", under which the California Supreme Court can at its choice, or if requested, order that a decision by the California Court of Appeals be excluded from publication,See California Constitution, Article VI, Sec. 14, and California Rules of Court Rule 8.1105(e)(2). which means that it becomes impossible to cite the decision in later legal actions,CRC Rule 8.1115. making the court less open and accountable. His criticism of the Commission on Judicial Performance in California led to a 1999 decision requiring it to disclose how each member voted in actions it takes.
Barnett died at age 73 died on October 13, 2009, in Oakland, California, of cardiac arrest. He was survived by his wife, Karine, as well as by a son, Alexander Barnett, and a stepson, Levon Barnett.
See also
|
|